Cillian Murphy Names the Only Two Sci-Fi Films He Calls True Masterpieces

Cillian Murphy has shared his thoughts on science fiction cinema and named two films he considers true standouts in the genre, highlighting a clear divide between popular space adventure stories and more philosophical sci-fi.

In comments given to Rotten Tomatoes, Murphy reflected on his relationship with the genre and how it changed over time. He said he grew up like many kids of his generation, heavily influenced by early exposure to space fantasy films, especially the cultural impact of Star Wars.

He explained, “I don’t know what qualifies you as a sci-fi fan, really. I was a huge Star Wars fan growing up, but there seems to be the fantasy side and the more serious science side. And then, as I got older, I watched those masterpieces: Solaris and 2001.”

The two films he referred to are widely regarded as major achievements in science fiction filmmaking. Solaris is known for its slow, reflective storytelling and focus on human emotion rather than action. Directed by Andrei Tarkovsky, it has often been praised by critics for its deep philosophical themes, even though its pacing and abstract style divide audiences.

At the time of release, Solaris received a mixed reaction from general viewers but strong critical attention over the years. It is now frequently listed among the most important art-house science fiction films ever made. Critics often point to its focus on memory, grief, and human psychology as reasons for its lasting influence.

The second film Murphy mentioned is 2001: A Space Odyssey, directed by Stanley Kubrick. This film is widely considered one of the most important works in cinema history, not just science fiction.

When it was released, 2001: A Space Odyssey received divided reviews, with some critics confused by its minimal dialogue and abstract narrative. However, over time it gained a reputation as a groundbreaking masterpiece. It is now praised for its visual effects, its realism in space travel depiction, and its exploration of artificial intelligence and human evolution.

Murphy also suggested that science fiction is often split into two types: one focused on entertainment and adventure, and another focused on deeper scientific and philosophical ideas. His comments reflect how both styles have shaped the genre in different ways.

Although he is strongly associated with major film projects, Murphy admitted he does not necessarily consider himself a dedicated science fiction fan. Instead, he views certain films within the genre as standout works rather than following it closely as a whole.

His perspective makes sense because sci-fi is a broad genre that can range from pure entertainment to deeply intellectual storytelling. Films like Solaris and 2001: A Space Odyssey continue to stand out because they challenge viewers rather than just entertain them. What do you think about his picks? Do you agree with them or would you choose different sci-fi films as masterpieces? Let us know in the comments!