5 Ways ‘Man of Steel’ Aged Poorly (And 5 Ways It Aged Masterfully)

Our Editorial Policy.

Share:

“Man of Steel” (2013) rebooted Superman for a modern audience, aiming to blend gritty realism with the iconic hero’s mythos. Over a decade later, opinions remain split—some see it as a bold take, while others feel it missed the mark.

As superhero films evolved, the movie’s strengths and flaws have become clearer. Let’s explore five ways “Man of Steel” hasn’t stood the test of time and five ways it still shines.

Overly Dark Tone (Aged Poorly)

Warner Bros.

The film’s grim atmosphere feels heavy compared to the brighter superhero movies that followed. Superman’s world lacks the hope and optimism fans expect from the character.

This dour approach clashes with the vibrant, colorful comic book roots. Later films, like those in the MCU, balanced darker themes with humor, making “Man of Steel” feel dated.

Groundbreaking Visual Effects (Aged Masterfully)

Warner Bros.

The movie’s visuals, especially the Kryptonian tech and flight scenes, still look stunning. The sleek, alien aesthetic of ships and suits holds up against newer blockbusters.

Action sequences, like Superman’s high-speed battles, remain thrilling and immersive. The film set a high bar for superhero spectacle that few have matched.

Destruction Overload (Aged Poorly)

Warner Bros.

The massive destruction in Metropolis, with collapsing buildings and implied civilian deaths, feels excessive today. Modern audiences prefer heroes who actively save people, not just fight villains.

The film’s climax ignores the human cost of Superman’s battle with Zod. This lack of focus on heroism makes the movie feel out of touch with current expectations.

Henry Cavill’s Casting (Aged Masterfully)

Warner Bros.

Henry Cavill’s portrayal of Superman remains a standout. His physical presence and earnest performance capture the character’s strength and vulnerability.

Even years later, Cavill’s Clark Kent feels authentic and relatable. Fans still praise his casting as a perfect fit for the iconic role.

Lack of Character Depth (Aged Poorly)

Warner Bros.

Many characters, like Lois Lane and Jonathan Kent, lack depth and clear motivations. Their arcs feel rushed or underdeveloped, which weakens the story.

Compared to newer superhero films with rich character development, this flatness stands out. Audiences now expect more emotional complexity from supporting roles.

Epic World-Building (Aged Masterfully)

Warner Bros.

The film’s take on Krypton’s culture, technology, and history feels expansive and unique. It grounds Superman’s origins in a detailed, believable sci-fi world.

This ambitious scope still impresses, offering a fresh perspective on a familiar mythos. The world-building remains a benchmark for superhero origin stories.

Superman’s Moral Choices (Aged Poorly)

Warner Bros.

Superman’s decision to kill Zod shocked many fans and feels jarring today. It strays from the character’s traditional moral code, which emphasizes finding another way.

Modern superhero films often show heroes wrestling with tough choices without crossing that line. This moment makes the film feel less like Superman’s story.

Emotional Father-Son Moments (Aged Masterfully)

Warner Bros.

The scenes between Clark and Jonathan Kent carry deep emotional weight. Their bond, built on quiet moments and tough lessons, resonates strongly.

These heartfelt interactions still tug at heartstrings. They show Clark’s humanity, making his journey as a hero more compelling.

Dated CGI in Some Scenes (Aged Poorly)

Warner Bros.

While the film’s major effects hold up, smaller CGI moments, like some Metropolis backgrounds, look dated. They lack the polish of today’s hyper-realistic visuals.

Newer blockbusters have raised the bar for seamless CGI integration. These weaker spots pull viewers out of the experience.

Bold Reimagining of Superman (Aged Masterfully)

Warner Bros.

The film took risks by presenting a more grounded, conflicted Superman. This fresh approach made the character feel relevant for a new generation.

Years later, this bold vision still sparks discussion and admiration. It paved the way for more daring takes on classic heroes.

What’s your take on how “Man of Steel” has aged—share your thoughts in the comments!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments