Ridley Scott Reportedly Blamed Paul Mescal for ‘Gladiator II,’ and It May Have Cost Him Another Role
Paul Mescal’s meteoric rise through Hollywood has rarely hit a rough patch, but his time working with Ridley Scott appears to have been far more complicated than fans realized. The Irish actor’s turn as Lucius in ‘Gladiator II’ was one of the most anticipated casting choices of the past few years, positioning him to inherit a franchise built on Russell Crowe’s iconic original performance.
That anticipation, however, didn’t fully translate into universal acclaim once the film actually hit theaters. Despite pulling in $462.2 million worldwide against a reported production budget north of $250 million, ‘Gladiator II’ faced mixed reactions from critics and audiences alike, with plenty of the discourse circling back to questions about Mescal’s fit for the role.
Now, new reporting suggests those concerns extended all the way to the director himself. According to industry journalist Matt Belloni’s reporting for Puck, Ridley Scott privately expressed dissatisfaction with Mescal following ‘Gladiator II,’ reportedly feeling the actor wasn’t masculine enough to carry the sequel’s central role. That frustration, according to the same reporting, may have directly contributed to Mescal later being dropped from Scott’s next project, the post-apocalyptic thriller ‘The Dog Stars.’
Mescal had originally been attached to headline ‘The Dog Stars’ alongside Scott, with the director publicly confirming the reunion during a December conversation with filmmaker Christopher Nolan following a ‘Gladiator II’ screening at the Directors Guild of America. At the time, Scott told Nolan that Mescal was “stacked up, doing the Beatles next,” suggesting he might have to let the actor go due to scheduling conflicts tied to Sam Mendes’ upcoming Beatles anthology films.
That scheduling explanation became the official public narrative when Jacob Elordi was announced as Mescal’s replacement in ‘The Dog Stars’ shortly afterward. Mescal’s team had cited his commitment to Mendes’ Beatles project, where he’s rumored to be playing Paul McCartney, as the reason for stepping away from Scott’s film.
According to the new reporting, that explanation has since been disputed, with suggestions that Scott’s underlying dissatisfaction with Mescal’s performance in ‘Gladiator II’ played a more significant role in the recasting than scheduling conflicts alone. ‘The Dog Stars’ ultimately moved forward with Elordi in the lead role, joined by Margaret Qualley, Josh Brolin, and Guy Pearce, and the film went on to open to just $7.7 million domestically upon release.
The financial struggles of ‘The Dog Stars’ have added an unexpected wrinkle to the situation, with some now suggesting that Mescal may have ultimately benefited from being replaced on a project that underperformed at the box office. Mescal, meanwhile, has continued building out an increasingly stacked résumé, with his involvement in Mendes’ Beatles films keeping him firmly in demand among major filmmakers.

For Scott, the situation adds another layer to an already complicated ‘Gladiator II’ legacy. While the film found box office success largely on the strength of the original franchise’s brand recognition, both critical reception and now these behind-the-scenes reports suggest the director’s confidence in his leading man may have wavered well before the film’s theatrical release.
Fans and industry observers have reacted with a mix of surprise and vindication to the reporting, with some pointing out that criticism of Mescal’s performance in ‘Gladiator II’ was already a common talking point among viewers following the film’s release. Whether Scott and Mescal ever work together again remains an open question, but for now, their creative partnership appears to have quietly come to an end.
Do you think Ridley Scott was right to replace Paul Mescal in The Dog Stars?
Have something to add? Let us know in the comments!

