A Film Critic Says Marvel Muzzled Him from Praising the Best Part of ‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’
Spoiler embargoes have become a routine part of how studios roll out their biggest blockbusters, but one film critic is arguing that the practice actively undermines the very thing critics are supposed to do. As ‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day‘ continues to dominate the box office, the debate over what critics are and aren’t allowed to discuss before release has resurfaced in a big way.
That tension sits at the center of a new piece from TheWrap film critic William Bibbiani, who argues that protecting Marvel’s biggest reveals came at the direct expense of honest criticism. Bibbiani had already published a glowing opening-weekend review of the film, but he says the embargo prevented him from discussing the element of the movie he loved most.
Every time Marvel Studios begs critics to prioritize their precious spoilers, the art of film criticism suffers, Bibbiani argues in his latest piece for TheWrap, explaining that the studio’s request to keep quiet about certain plot and character details tied his hands during the film’s initial release window. Now that the movie has crossed the billion-dollar mark and most audiences have either seen it or heard the news, he says he can finally discuss what actually made the film special.
According to Bibbiani, the best part of ‘Brand New Day’ wasn’t the Spider-Man action sequences he already praised in his original review, but rather the film’s central antagonist: Sadie Sink’s Jean Grey. He argues that unlike the comics version of the character, the film introduces Jean as a villain lashing out at a world that stripped away everything she had, after her mother disowned her and her sister was abducted and denied human rights by the government.
Bibbiani writes that Jean’s isolation ties directly into a broader thematic thread running through the entire film, one shared by nearly every powered character who appears in it. He describes Spider-Man as someone who isolates himself from loved ones even while surrounded by cheering crowds, the Hulk as someone who spent years avoiding connection out of fear, and the Punisher as a man resentful that Spider-Man won’t take advantage of the love and connection he lost forever.

For Bibbiani, the film’s true emotional climax isn’t a physical battle at all. He describes the moment when Spider-Man lets his guard down and intentionally invites Jean into his mind, showing her a private, unconditional memory of Aunt May’s love rather than fighting her directly. He writes that the experience changes Jean, exposing her to another point of view in a way that mirrors what great art is supposed to do.
He goes on to say that the scene resonated with him on a deeply personal level, admitting that if anyone heard crying in the theater during the film’s climax, “it might have been me, or it might have been anyone else who felt seen — at the end of a superhero movie, in a cinematic universe that hasn’t felt personal in a long time.”
He adds, “It depresses me that Marvel told critics not to mention why their own film is beautiful. My job is to talk about their art, whether it’s shallow corporate hackery or moving, emotional pop cinema. And I’d rather do that than pretend Jean Grey’s identity was more important than her character.”
Bibbiani closes his piece by pushing back on the broader culture of spoiler secrecy surrounding franchise blockbusters, arguing that Jean Grey, Spider-Man, and the film itself all mean something, while spoiler culture and opening-weekend vibes mean considerably less by comparison. His original review had already praised the film as one of the strongest entries in the modern Marvel Cinematic Universe, calling it a rare highlight in a franchise that doesn’t produce great movies as often as it used to.
Should Marvel allow critics to discuss major spoilers in reviews after a movie releases?
Have something to add? Let us know in the comments!

