Paramount’s Warner Bros. Merger Could Come With a Steep Penalty for Skipping Theaters

Depositphotos

Share:

Few Hollywood stories have dragged on as long, or carried as much weight, as the Paramount Warner Bros. merger. The blockbuster deal has been stuck in legal limbo for months, and one theatrical promise could now decide how it ends. A new report suggests that promise could soon come with a real penalty for skipping theaters.

Paramount Skydance’s roughly $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery has already cleared federal antitrust review. The FCC also approved its foreign investment provisions last week. That leaves the lawsuit from 12 Democratic state attorneys general, led by California’s Rob Bonta, along with the Writers Guild of America, who argue the deal would give the company an undue share of the film and cable-TV industries.

Paramount has long promised to release at least 30 films a year in theaters, a pledge it originally made in February when the deal was announced. It also offered that promise to major theater chains to win their support. California’s attorney general has repeatedly said he opposes remedies like this because they are hard to enforce, which is where the new report comes in.

Bloomberg reported on Sunday that settlement talks between Paramount and California officials include a financial penalty if the company fails to distribute 30 films per year in theaters. Paramount would reportedly owe $30 million for every film that falls short of that target, according to two people familiar with the discussions. One of those people added that it could also be forced to sell its stake in Miramax, the studio behind ‘Pulp Fiction’, if it misses the goal.

The news spread quickly on social media, including a post from DiscussingFilm that passed 430,000 views. No terms have been finalized, and a California Department of Justice spokesperson has said potential settlement talks are confidential. Paramount has declined to comment.

The penalty is just one piece of a larger puzzle. According to Bloomberg, other ideas floated include a promise to keep the company in California, a sale of some cable channels, and an agreement not to negotiate distribution for all of its channels together. The Hollywood Reporter notes that Comedy Central has been cited as one possible sale, and that keeping the two film studios separate within the combined company is also being discussed.

A significant investment in US film production is also in the mix, and one person put the size of that promise at around $1.5 billion. One point of contention is a proposal to appoint an editorial monitor at CNN rather than mandate a sale of the network. Some of the states involved oppose parts of what is being floated, and the Writers Guild may not be fully on board either.

RELATED:

Mark Ruffalo Tells California’s Attorney General: ‘Don’t You Dare’ Settle the Paramount Megamerger Suit

There is real urgency behind the talks. Paramount reportedly owes Warner Bros. shareholders a $7 million daily payment starting October 1 if no deal is reached, which gives CEO David Ellison a strong incentive to settle. A trial is otherwise set for 2027.

Investors have noticed. Paramount’s shares rose nearly 7% and Warner Bros. Discovery’s climbed 8.4% in after-market trading on Friday as reports of a possible settlement emerged. Meanwhile, opposition groups have organized rallies in Oakland, Los Angeles and New York, pressing Bonta not to accept a weak settlement.

If a 30-movie target with real teeth survives, it could mean more films in cinemas and steadier release calendars. The requirement could also shape the merged company’s future production and distribution strategy as studios keep rethinking how many movies get a traditional theatrical release. Netflix Junkie reports the target has built-in flexibility, since films distributed from other studios can count toward the total.

For theater owners and fans, a legally binding number is very different from a voluntary pledge. The catch is that any deal remains far from final, and its details could still change before anything is signed. Whether Bonta is willing to accept an enforcement mechanism like this one is the big question.

Would a $30 million penalty be enough to enforce Paramount's 30-film theatrical pledge?

Have something to add? Let us know in the comments.

Don't miss:

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted